Laws prohibiting Dowry in India

Published on 02 Apr 2016 by Team

Endowment is extremely predominant and regular in Indian family units. It is a practice that has turned into a parasite for the Indian culture and which has dissolved the lovely foundation of marriage. It is not another practice but rather has been taken after from ages, and its effect is such in Indian culture that one can attempt endeavours to decrease it, however, it can't be completely destroyed. A few laws have been ordered to preclude the act of endowment, yet the lawful grasps are weaker than the ambit of the act of settlement. Further, the article should specify the social and legitimate outcomes of rehearsing endowment alongside its different angles.

What Will Be The Share?

Under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, the expression "endowment" implies any property or important security given or consented to be given either straightforwardly or in a roundabout way.

  1. By one gathering to a marriage to the next gathering to the marriage, or
  2. By the guardian of either gathering to a marriage or by some other individual, to either gathering to the marriage or to some other individual, at or before [or at whatever time after the marriage] [in association with the marriage of the said gatherings, yet does not include] dower or mahr on account of persons to whom the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat).

In a case, the court held that "Settlement" in the feeling of the expression thought about by Dowry Prohibition Act is an interest for property of profitable security having an inseparable nexus with the marriage, i.e., it is a thought from the side of the lady's guardians or relatives to the lucky man or his guardians and/or watchman for the consent to marry the lady-to-be. In any case, where the interest for property or important security has no association with the thought of the marriage, it won't sum to an interest for share. You can contact a good family law lawyer in India to know more about the legal action against dowry.

In Rajeev v. RamKishan Jaiswal, the court held that any property given by folks of the lady need not be in light of the marriage, it can even be regarding the marriage and would constitute endowment.

Under the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, it is an offence to both take endowment and gives the share. So the group of husband would be obligated for taking share so would the group of lady be to agree to give settlement.

The legitimate system in India for precluding endowment

Endowment Prohibition Act, 1961

  • Punishment for giving and taking endowment (Section 3)- According to section 3, if any individual after the initiation of the Act gives or takes, abets the giving or taking of share should be rebuffed with a detainment for a term at the very least five years and with fine which might not be under fifteen thousand rupees or the measure of the estimation of settlement, whichever is more. You can file a complaint regarding dowry harassment through the best family law advocates in India.
  • Penalty for requesting share (Section 4)- According to section 4, if any individual specifically or by implication requests settlement from the folks, relatives or gatekeepers of the lady or the spouse should be rebuffed with a detainment of the very least six months and which might reach out to two years and with fine which might stretch out to ten thousand rupees.
  • The Supreme Court has held in Pandurang Shivram Kawathkar v. Condition of Maharashtra that the simple interest of share before marriage is an offence.
    In a case, the court held that the expired had before being determined to flame by her in-laws composed a letter to her dad that she was by and large abused, bugged and undermined with desperate results for-fulfilment of interest of endowment. Along these lines, an offence of requesting share under the provision had been submitted.
  • Ban on notice(section 4-A)- The commercial in any daily paper,diary or through whatever other medium or an offer in the property, business, cash, and so on by any individual in thought for marriage might be rebuffed with a detainment which should not be under six months and which might stretch out to five years or with fine which might reach out to fifteen thousand rupees.
  • Cognizance of offence- According to section 7, a judge not beneath the rank of a metropolitan magistrate or Judicial Magistrate of First Class should attempt an offence under this Act. The court should take discernment of the offence just on the report by the casualty, the folks or relative of the casualty, police report or all alone information of the actualities of the offence.
  • Certain offences under this Act might be cognizable, non-bailable and-compoundable.

Indian Penal Code, 1860

  •  Dowry Death Section 304(B) peruses as takes after-
  1. Where the demise of a lady is brought about by any blazes or real harm or happens generally than under ordinary circumstances inside of seven years of her marriage and it is demonstrated that soon before her passing she was subjected to savagery or badgering by her spouse or any relative of her spouse for, or regarding, any interest for endowment, such demise might be called "share passing" and such spouse or relatives should be considered to have created her demise.
    Clarification- For the motivations behind this sub-section, "share" might have the same importance as in section 2 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
  2. Whoever submits endowment passing might be rebuffed with detainment for a term which should not be under seven years but rather which might stretch out to detainment forever.

In VemuriVenkateshwara Rao v. Condition of Andhra Pradesh, the court has set out the accompanying rule for setting up an offence under section 304(B) and they are-

  1. That there is an interest of share and badgering by the denounced,
  2. That the perished had kicked the bucket,
  • That the demise is under unnatural circumstances. Since there was interest in share and provocation and passing inside of 7 years of marriage, alternate things consequently take after and an offence under section 304-B is demonstrated.Husband or relative of spouse subjecting ladies to pitilessness (section 498A)- Section 498A peruses as takes after-

Husband or his relative subjecting her to pitilessness- Whoever, being the spouse the relatives of the spouse of a lady, subject such lady to mercilessness might be rebuffed with detainment for a term which might reach out to three years and should likewise be obligated to fine. The best family law attorneys in India can be consulted to file a complaint against the husband or his relative.

Clarification- For the motivation behind this section "savagery" implies-

  1. Any obstinate behaviour which is of such a nature as is liable to drive the lady to submit suicide or to bring about grave harm or risk to life, appendage or well-being(whether mental or physical) of the lady, or
  2. Harassment of the lady where such provocation is with a perspective to forcing her or any individual identified with her to take care of any unlawful demand for any property or significant security or is because of disappointment by her or any individual identified with her to take care of such demand

In Bhoora Singh v. State, it was held that the spouse and in-laws subjected the wife the cold-bloodedness for bringing deficient settlement lastly torched her, along these lines welcoming a sentence of three years through detainment and a fine of Rs.500/- for an offence submitted under section 498A of Indian Penal Code.

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

  • Presumption as to endowment passing (Section 113 B)- Section 113 B peruses as takes after-

At the point when the inquiry is whether a man has conferred settlement passing of a lady and it is demonstrated that soon before her demise such lady had been subjected by such individual to cold-bloodedness or badgering for, or regarding, any interest for share, the court might assume that such individual had brought about the endowment passing.

Legistify connects you with the best lawyers in India and top Chartered Accountants in India with simple telephonic conversation or email. Call us at 846-883-3013 or send us an email at [email protected] to get started.


Top Legal Queries

Get answers from the best experts within minutes!

Most Consulted Advocates

Choose from our most consulted lawyers across India and get instant legal advice.

Top Consulted Advocates

Choose from our most consulted lawyers across India and get instant legal advice.


© Legistify Services Pvt. Ltd.

Home|About|Contact