Role of Civil Court in Company Law Matters

Published on 01 Apr 2016 by Team

Common law courts take cognizance of the considerable number of suits of common nature with the exception of few of which the purview is particularly removed. In India, the working of the common court is guided by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

A suit in which the privilege to property or to an office is challenged is a suit of a common nature, despite that such right might depend completely on the choices of inquiries as to religious customs or functions.

It can be deduced from the over that the common courts can arbitrate upon every one of the suits of common nature with the exception of those where the purview has been explicitly or impliedly banished. The expression 'explicitly or impliedly banned' has been examined by courts in a few cases and now it is settled rule that the locale can be banished either through an express procurement under any statute or by the authoritative aim which is obviously inferred from the statute.

In State v. Mask and Co., the Privy Council stated that 'it is settled law that the prohibition of the purview of the common court is not to be promptly gathered, but rather that such avoidance should either be communicated or unmistakably suggested." From the recognition of the Privy Council, it is clear that the position in connection to the purview of the common court was clarified in the absolute starting point. Talk to the best corporate lawyers in India to know more.

The Supreme Court of India talked about the matter much later in the year 1963 on account of Radha Kishan v. Ludhiyana Municipality wherein it was held that:

"Under section 9 of the common system code, the court should have a locale to attempt all suits of common nature with the exception of suits of which perception is either explicitly or impliedly banished. A statute, in this way, explicitly or by important ramifications can bar the purview of the common court in admiration of a specific matter. The negligible conferment of extraordinary purview on a tribunal in admiration of the said matter does not in itself bar the ward of common courts. The statute might particularly accommodate removing the locale of common courts; regardless of the possibility that there was no particular rejection, on the off chance that it makes risk not existing before and gives an extraordinary and specific solution for the wronged party, the cure gave by it must be taken after. The same rule would apply if the statue had accommodated the specific gathering in which the cure could be had. Indeed, even in such cases, the common court's ward is not totally expelled."

Structure the two judgments it is clear that common court can arbitrate upon every one of the suits of common nature unless its ward is explicitly or impliedly banished.It ought to likewise be remembered that the expression "impliedly" ought to never be given liberal elucidation rather strict methodology ought to be received and clear ramifications from the statute is required for expelling the ward of the common court. Top corporate law advocates in India can help you understand this better.

National Company Law Tribunal

The Companies Act, 2013 presented the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to supplant the current Company Law Board. The anticipation of building up another tribunal to alleviate the courts of the superfluous weight and every one of the matters pending under the steady gaze of the Company Law Board is to be exchanged to the NCLT according to the Company Act, 2013.

CDS Financial Services (Mauritius) Limited Vs. BPL, in this case, it was held that “when there is no express provision excluding the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts, such exclusion can be implied only in cases where a right itself is created and the machinery of enforcement of such right is also provided by the statute. If the right is traceable to the general law of contracts or it is a common law right, it can be enforced through the Civil Court, even though the forum under the statute also will have jurisdiction to enforce that right. Sections 397,398 and 408 of the Companies Act, 1956 do not confer exclusive jurisdiction on the company court to grant reliefs against oppression and mismanagement. The scope of these sections is to provide a convenient remedy for minority shareholders under certain conditions and the provisions therein are not intended to exclude all other remedies.

It can be summarized that there is no express procurement under the Company Act, 1956, which bars the purview of common court over the organization matters. It is clear from a few judgments that at whatever point a common question emerges, regardless of the possibility that under Company Law, the Civil Court's locale can never be expelled. You can talk to the best corporate attorneys in India to file a case with the NCLT.

It is additionally clear from the judgments that express or inferred condition excepting the purview is vital. The purview of Civil Court can be banned just under those circumstances where it has been explicitly rejected under the procurements of the demonstration. Area 9 of the CPC states that Civil Courts have a ward to attempt every one of the suits of a common nature aside from suits of which their awareness is explicitly or impliedly banished. Best illustration for this is the locale of Civil Court is banned under the Securitization Law and Civil Court's frequently get into the matter identified with it.

In conclusion, it is exceptionally hard to bar the purview of the common court in connection to organization law matters and the position in connection to it has of now been settled through different case laws.

Legistify connects you with the best lawyers in India and top Chartered Accountants in India with simple telephonic conversation or email. Call us at 846-883-3013 or send us an email at [email protected] to get started.

Related Posts

Browse through other related Blogs posts here

Top Legal Queries

Get answers from the best experts within minutes!

Most Consulted Advocates

Choose from our most consulted lawyers across India and get instant legal advice.

Top Consulted Advocates

Choose from our most consulted lawyers across India and get instant legal advice.

© Legistify Services Pvt. Ltd.


function gtag() {dataLayer.push(arguments)}