Fraud as a ground for Divorce

Under Indian marriage laws marriage can be put aside if the consent for it was secured by deception or coercion of fact. This is not that simple to demonstrate. Regardless, it must be noticed that misrepresentation is not characterized in the Indian marriage laws. Hence, any kind of misrepresentation can’t be taken as a ground for martial breakdown.

In many countries, spouses wishing to file for divorce can choose one of many grounds, or reasons, upon which to base their divorce. State laws can vary widely when it comes to divorce law. In some states, the fraudulent conduct of one spouse may provide grounds for divorce, though this is more commonly grounds for annulment, which voids the marriage as if it never existed rather than divorce.Pic Courtesy- WikiHow

Under Indian marriage laws,marriage can be put aside if the consent for it was secured by deception or coercion of fact. This is not that simple to demonstrate. Regardless, it must be noticed that misrepresentation is not characterized in the Indian marriage laws. Hence, any kind of misrepresentation can't be taken as a ground for marital breakdown.

Click here to read on Contested Divorce Laws in India


The definition of fraud in the context of divorce law varies between countries. Generally, it means that one spouse grossly misrepresented issues so important that the other spouse would not have married him had she known the truth.

For example, when a husband tells his wife before they married that he had never been married before and she discovers after the marriage that he was lying. His lie about his previous marriage may be considered fraud, especially if the wife can show that she would not have married him had she known this was his second marriage. Little white lies usually do not constitute fraud.

Impact of Fraud

If the filing spouse is able to prove fraud, the family court may be more sympathetic to the filing spouse and give her a larger share of property if state law allows him to consider the misconduct as part of property division. Financial fraud is particularly relevant to decisions about property division and spousal support. However, some couuntries do not allow judges to consider misconduct or fault when making property decisions.

Pic Courtesy- livescience

Statutory Provisions 

Section 12 of The Hindu Marriage Act, speaks about voidable marraiges which says any marriage solemnised, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, shall be voidable and may be annulled by a decree of nullity on any of the following grounds, namely:—

  • That the marriage has not been consummated owing to the impotence of the respondent
  • That the marriage is in contravention of the condition specified in clause (ii) of section 5
  • That the consent of the petitioner, or where the consent of the guardian in marriage of the petitioner was required under section 5 as it stood immediately before the commencement of the Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Act, 1978 (2 of 1978), the consent of such guardian was "obtained by force or by fraud" as to the nature of the ceremony or as to any material fact or circumstance concerning the respondent.
  • That the respondent was at the time of the marriage pregnant by some person other than the petitioner.

Click here to read on Mutual Divorce Laws in India

Judicial Decisions

Non-disclosure of age and factum of having major children by husband at the time of marriage amounts to fraud and suppression of material facts having bearing on marriage. Courts have held that the marriage found on fraud are a very inception to its nullity. (Sunder Lal Soni v. Smt. Namita Jain, AIR 2006 MP 51).

Misrepresentation as to the age of the bridegroom made to the mother who acted as an agent and the daughter consented for the marriage believing the statement to be true. It was held that the consent was vitiated by fraud. (Babui Panmate v. Ram Agya Singh, AIR 1968 Pat 190).

Anath Nath De V. Lajjabati Devi, also, the case was under the Hindu Marraige Act, 1955, and S. Datta, who delivered the judgment, has observed at page 779 that the marriage according to Hindu law not being a contract, the consent at the stage of negotiations though obtained by fraud cannot affect the validity of the marriage. It is true that in that case no fraud was alleged at the time of the solemnization of the marriage and, therefore, the petitioner could not be granted any relief. But at the same time, the case was decided on the footing that even under the Hindu Marriage Act, the marriage is a sacrament and not a civil contract. My attention is also drawn to the provisions of Section 19 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. That section, so far as it is relevant here, reads thus :-

"A person who freely consents to a solemnization of the marriage with the other party in accordance with customary ceremonies, that is, with knowledge of the nature of the ceremonies and intention to marry, cannot raise an objection to the validity of the marriageon the ground of any fraudulent representation or concealment. The test to be applied is whether there was any real consent to the solemnization of the marriage."

Pic Courtesy- WikiHow

It would thus be seen that the word "fraud" used in Section 12(1)(C) of the Hindu MarriageAct does not speak of fraud in any general way, nor does it mean every misrepresentation or concealment which may be fraudulent. If the consent given by the parties is a real consent to the solemnization of the marriage, the same cannot be avoided on the ground of fraud. The marriage, therefore, solemnized under the Hindu Marriage Act cannot be avoided by showing that the petitioner was induced to marry the respondent by fraudulent statements relating to her health.