Trespass can also have criminal connotations to it. The general definition of criminal trespass is similar to that of Civil trespass, the difference arises with the intention to commit the offence, as in this case, it is present and material.
The definition of criminal trespass is explicitly provided by Section 441 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The section defines Criminal trespass as an act of entering the property, in the possession of another, with the intention to commit an offence or to annoy, insult or intimidate the person in possession of the property or having legitimately entered and unlawfully staying there.
The Supreme Court analyzed the meaning of 'trespass' in 2010 in the case of Laxmi Ram Pawar v. Sitabai Balu Dhotre , with regards to Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971. The Supreme Court was of the assessment that, 'A trespass is an unlawful obstruction with one's individual, property or rights. With reference to property, it is a wrongful attack to another's ownership.'
A man who unlawfully stays in the property of the other is additionally obligated for 'trespass by staying on the area.' This is the point at which a man legally goes into another persons' property, however, stays there even after the right ceases to exist.
Essentials of Trespass
It can be assembled that, the vital elements of a criminal trespass, are:
- 1.Entry into or upon property in the ownership of another;
- 2.If such passage is legitimate, then unlawfully staying upon such property;
- 3.Such passage or unlawful staying must be with an aim to confer offence, irritate or scare the individual.
Ownership vs Possession
It is important to note that 'ownership' and 'possession' may not necessarily be the same thing. For the tort of trespass, anyone who has an actual and genuine claim for possession of the land can bring action against the trespasser. This means that the person need not necessarily be the owner of the property/land, but, should have actual possession of the land and the legal right to exclude others along with it. The tort of trespass is often contrasted with the tort of nuisance. The difference between the both is that in case of the nuisance it needs to be shown that, both, the damage and intrusion was unreasonable, but, in trespass, such elements are lacking. The owner of the property, however, has to be cautious in case of a trespasser, unaware of the title and ownership of the land, enters into the property and is allowed to have possession for a continuous period of time, the owner may lose the title to the property
Supreme Court's view
The same was seen by the Supreme Court in the case of Nair Service Society v. K.C. Alexander on the premise of which different recommendations concerning trespasser opposite a genuine proprietor were set down. A portion of the applicable recommendations are mentioned beneath:
Unapproved passage into another's territory won't have the impact of dispossessing the genuine proprietor. Such acts will prompt settled possession only when the genuine proprietor knowing about it, submits to the same
When the trespasser is not in settled possession, the legitimate proprietor can re-enter and re-establish himself by using minimum force necessary so as to evacuate the impediment or unapproved development or constrain. Such activity by genuine proprietor will be considered as protectinghis ownership.
Be that as it may, if the trespasser is in settled possession and such adverse possession proceeds for a long time, the right of the genuine proprietor ceases to exist.
In this manner, if the demonstrations of the individual possessing a property are hopeless with the privileges of the genuine proprietor, such demonstrations of the individual under lock and key would constitute adverse possession/settled possession against the genuine proprietor. As an outcome, it is constantly fitting for the proprietor to approach the court for a cure against any sort of trespass if rehashed notification to the trespasser goes inadequate.
The proprietor or occupant of the area possessing the property is qualified for cures as:
(i) Injunction – to limit trespasser from creating any further harm
(ii) Damages – remuneration for every one of the misfortunes you have acquired because of the trespass.
Safety measures and Procedure:
It is critical for a man to be prepared so as to handle an occurrence of trespass in their territory/property. Most importantly, one needs to keep his/her title deeds viz mother deed, movement deed, up to date charge paid receipt, khata from the proper power prepared. If there should be an occurrence of an agrarian area, RTC extricates (Record of Rights, Tenancy and development) and MR separate (Mutation Register) from concerned Tahasil office and Akarbandh, Tippani duplicate, and Phodi sketch from the study division. All the previously stated records demonstrate that the individual has a lawful title and is the legitimate proprietor and has been in serene ownership and happiness regarding the subject property.
Aside from having all these authoritative archives set up, all together keep away from trespass and to be at a more secure side one needs to put either compound divider or spiked metal perimeter around their property and display his possession with board expressing 'This property has a place with XYZ, trespassers will be arraigned. (with telephone No.)' This offers one to proclaim that he has some assistance with having the undisputed title to the property without any protests from anyone including the trespasser.
Filing a complaint
Disregarding this, if the trespasser enters one's property more than once even after requesting that they leave, or harms his load up or compound, then one must simply ahead and lodge a police protest under Section 441 of the Indian Penal Code. You could likewise argue for interval alleviation from the court controlling the trespasser from bringing about any further harm. Interval or provisional alleviation can be allowed at any time of a suit. It is conceded on the off chance that it is demonstrated by affirmation or something else, that the subject property is in peril of being squandered, distanced or if litigant undermines to discard the property with the expectation to cheat banks.
Further, one can likewise document a suit for affirmation of title, as once it is proclaimed that you have the title to the property, the trespasser can't exchange the property wrongfully. It is likewise rude for you to know the particulars of the trespasser and make note of the occurrences of trespass. Points of interest like the date, time, the number of times the individual trespassed, alongside a photo or video would add to your advantage.
Legistify connects you with the best lawyers in India and top Chartered Accountants in India with simple telephonic conversation or email. Call us at 011-33138123 or send us an email at email@example.com to get started.